Does carbon emissions trading facilitate carbon unlocking? Empirical evidence from China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58567/jes01010007Keywords:
Carbon lock-in, Indicator system, Carbon emissions trading, DID, SCMAbstract
Carbon emissions trading is essential for reducing carbon emissions, and its role in regional carbon unlocking needs further clarification. This study uses the difference-in-differences (DID) model and synthetic control model (SCM) to evaluate the carbon unlocking effect of China’s six pilot carbon trading provinces. This study found that (1) carbon lock-in effects in China are mainly influenced by technology lock-in and fixed input lock-in; (2) each province’s overall carbon lock-in level presents a decreasing trend yearly, and the regional distribution presents characteristics of “low in the east and high in the west”; (3) carbon emissions trading pilot policies effectively promote the carbon unlocking effect in pilot regions overall, with Guangdong having the most significant unlocking effect. Conversely, Beijing, Hubei, Chongqing, and Shanghai also had different degrees of carbon unlocking. Finally, (4) an assessment of impact mechanisms indicates that technology and institutions have a significant mediating role in effectively promoting carbon unlocking under the carbon trading policy. Conversely, social behavior has an inverse effect, and fixed assets are not affected by the policy. This study demonstrates the carbon unlocking effect of carbon emissions trading and provides a quantitative reference for implementing carbon emissions trading policies and determining carbon unlocking paths.
References
Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. (2010) Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association;105; 493-505.
Abadie A, Gardeazabal J. (2003) The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review;93; 113-132.
Angrist JD, Krueger AB, (1999). Chapter 23 - Empirical Strategies in Labor Economics, In: Ashenfelter OC, Card D (Eds), Handbook of Labor Economics, vol. 3. Elsevier. pp. 1277-1366.
Bauer F, Nielsen TD, Nilsson LJ, Palm E, Ericsson K, Fråne A, Cullen J. (2022) Plastics and climate change—Breaking carbon lock-ins through three mitigation pathways. One Earth;5; 361-376.
Brown MA, Chandler J, Lapsa MV, Sovacool BK, (2008). Carbon Lock-In: Barriers to Deploying Climate Change Mitigation Technologies, United States, p. Medium: ED; Size: 176 p.
Carley S. (2011) Historical analysis of U.S. electricity markets: Reassessing carbon lock-in. Energy Policy;39; 720-732.
Chen X, Li Z, Gallagher KP, Mauzerall DL. (2021) Financing carbon lock-in in developing countries: Bilateral financing for power generation technologies from China, Japan, and the United States. Applied Energy;300; 117318.
Driscoll P. (2014) Breaking Carbon Lock-In: Path Dependencies in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects. Planning Practice and Research;29; 317-330.
Dubois G, Sovacool B, Aall C, Nilsson M, Barbier C, Herrmann A, Bruyère S, Andersson C, Skold B, Nadaud F, Dorner F, Moberg KR, Ceron JP, Fischer H, Amelung D, Baltruszewicz M, Fischer J, Benevise F, Louis VR, Sauerborn R. (2019) It starts at home? Climate policies targeting household consumption and behavioral decisions are key to low-carbon futures. Energy Research & Social Science;52; 144-158.
Erickson P, Kartha S, Lazarus M, Tempest K. (2015) Assessing carbon lock-in. Environ. Res. Lett.;10; 084023.
Fisch-Romito V, Guivarch C, Creutzig F, Minx JC, Callaghan MW. (2021) Systematic map of the literature on carbon lock-in induced by long-lived capital. Environ. Res. Lett.;16; 053004.
Guan Y, Shan Y, Huang Q, Chen H, Wang D, Hubacek K. (2021) Assessment to China's Recent Emission Pattern Shifts. Earth's Future;9.
IEA, (2021a). Global Energy Review 2021.
IEA, (2021b). GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM ENERGY 2021 Edition.
Janipour Z, de Nooij R, Scholten P, Huijbregts MAJ, de Coninck H. (2020) What are sources of carbon lock-in in energy-intensive industry? A case study into Dutch chemicals production. Energy Research & Social Science;60; 101320.
Jin G, Yingzhi X. (2015) An Empirical Study on Carbon Lock-in and Unlocking Path in China with Technological Progress Perspective. Forum on Science and Technology in China; 113-118.
Karlsson R. (2012) Carbon lock-in, rebound effects and China at the limits of statism. Energy Policy;51; 939-945.
Kiss T, Popovics S. (2021) Evaluation on the effectiveness of energy policies – Evidence from the carbon reductions in 25 countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews;149; 111348.
Li L, Taeihagh A. (2020) An in-depth analysis of the evolution of the policy mix for the sustainable energy transition in China from 1981 to 2020. Applied Energy;263; 114611.
Lin B, Huang C. (2022) Analysis of emission reduction effects of carbon trading: Market mechanism or government intervention? Sustainable Production and Consumption;33; 28-37.
Lin B, Jia Z. (2017) The impact of Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) and the choice of coverage industry in ETS: A case study in China. Applied Energy;205; 1512-1527.
Liwen S, Peng Z, Xiangwei R, Ying H. (2020) Does Carbon Trading Reduce Carbon Lock-in in China's Industry: An Empirical Analysis Based on DID and SDID Method. Science and Technology Management Research;40; 205-211.
Long R, Shao T, Chen H. (2016) Spatial econometric analysis of China’s province-level industrial carbon productivity and its influencing factors. Applied Energy;166; 210-219.
McKie D, Galloway C. (2007) Climate change after denial: Global reach, global responsibilities, and public relations. Public Relations Review;33; 368-376.
Niu H, Liu Z. (2021) Measurement on carbon lock-in of China based on RAGA-PP model. Carbon Management;12; 451-463.
Pan X, Pu C, Yuan S, Xu H. (2022) Effect of Chinese pilots carbon emission trading scheme on enterprises' total factor productivity: The moderating role of government participation and carbon trading market efficiency. Journal of Environmental Management;316; 115228.
Qin L, Kirikkaleli D, Hou Y, Miao X, Tufail M. (2021) Carbon neutrality target for G7 economies: Examining the role of environmental policy, green innovation and composite risk index. Journal of Environmental Management;295; 113119.
Rogge KS, Hoffmann VH. (2010) The impact of the EU ETS on the sectoral innovation system for power generation technologies – Findings for Germany. Energy Policy;38; 7639-7652.
Seto KC, Davis SJ, Mitchell RB, Stokes EC, Unruh G, Ürge-Vorsatz D. (2016) Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources;41; 425-452.
Shan Y, Guan D, Zheng H, Ou J, Li Y, Meng J, Mi Z, Liu Z, Zhang Q. (2018) China CO2 emission accounts 1997–2015. Scientific Data;5; 170201.
Shan Y, Huang Q, Guan D, Hubacek K. (2020) China CO2 emission accounts 2016–2017. Scientific Data;7.
Shan Y, Liu J, Liu Z, Xu X, Shao S, Wang P, Guan D. (2016) New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors. Applied Energy;184; 742-750.
Susskind L, Chun J, Goldberg S, Gordon JA, Smith G, Zaerpoor Y. (2020) Breaking Out of Carbon Lock-In: Malaysia’s Path to Decarbonization. Frontiers in Built Environment;6.
Teixidó J, Verde SF, Nicolli F. (2019) The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change: The empirical evidence. Ecological Economics;164; 106347.
Unruh GC. (2000) Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy;28; 817-830.
Wang C, Shi Y, Zhang L, Zhao X, Chen H. (2021) The policy effects and influence mechanism of China’s carbon emissions trading scheme. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health;14; 2101-2114.
Wang L, Wang Z, Ma Y. (2022a) Does environmental regulation promote the high-quality development of manufacturing? A quasi-natural experiment based on China's carbon emission trading pilot scheme. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences;81; 101216.
Wang P, Wu W, Zhu B, Wei Y. (2013) Examining the impact factors of energy-related CO2 emissions using the STIRPAT model in Guangdong Province, China. Applied Energy;106; 65-71.
Wang X, Huang J, Liu H. (2022b) Can China's carbon trading policy help achieve Carbon Neutrality? — A study of policy effects from the Five-sphere Integrated Plan perspective. Journal of Environmental Management;305; 114357.
Wang X, Zhang L, Qin Y, Zhang J. (2020) Analysis of China’s Manufacturing Industry Carbon Lock-In and Its Influencing Factors. Sustainability;12; 1502.
Xihua Q, Meijin Y, Maomao S. (2013) Carbon Lock-in Issue in Chinese Economic Development and its Unlocking Strategies. Science and Technology Management Research;33; 201-204.
Xu Y, Dong B, Chen Y, Qin H. (2022) Effect of industrial transfer on carbon lock-in: a spatial econometric analysis of Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management;65; 1024-1055.
Xuan D, Ma X, Shang Y. (2020) Can China’s policy of carbon emission trading promote carbon emission reduction? Journal of Cleaner Production;270; 122383.
Yingzhi X, Yan C. (2018) Spatial Spillover Effects of Carbon Lock-in among Provinces in China – An Empirical Study Based on Spatial Auto-regressive Model. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition); 126-134.
Zhang G, Zhang N. (2020) The effect of China's pilot carbon emissions trading schemes on poverty alleviation: A quasi-natural experiment approach. Journal of Environmental Management;271; 110973.
Zhang W-W, Zhao B, Gu Y, Sharp B, Xu S-C, Liou K-N. (2020) Environmental impact of national and subnational carbon policies in China based on a multi-regional dynamic CGE model. Journal of Environmental Management;270; 110901.
Zhang X, Qi T-y, Ou X-m, Zhang X-l. (2017) The role of multi-region integrated emissions trading scheme: A computable general equilibrium analysis. Applied Energy;185; 1860-1868.
Zhu J. (2018) Analysis of carbon emission efficiency based on DEA model. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography;21; 405-409.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Tianqi Wang, Yawen Sun, Yong Wang, Yuhao Yang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.