A Study of Hierarchical Risk Parity in Portfolio Construction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58567/jea03030006Keywords:
Hierarchical clustering; hierarchical risk parity; mean-variance method; portfolio construction; machine learning in financeAbstract
The construction and optimization of a portfolio is a complex process that has been a historically active research area in finance. For portfolios with highly correlated assets, the performance of traditional risk-based asset allocations methods such as the mean-variance (MV) model is limited when numerous assets are correlated. A novel clustering-based asset allocation method, called Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP), provides an opportunity to mitigate these limitations in portfolio construction. HRP utilizes the hierarchical relationships between the covariance of assets in a portfolio to determine weight distributions, eliminating the need for the inversion of the covariance matrix that is required by most traditional risk-based asset allocation methods. This research examines the viability of Hierarchical Risk Parity (HRP) method in portfolio construction of a US equity portfolio and compares the performances of HRP to traditional asset allocation methods exemplified by the mean-variance (MV) method. The results of this research show that the performance of the HRP method is comparable to the performance of the MV method. Given these findings, HRP provides an advantageous approach for portfolio construction in practical scenarios where correlated assets are present in the portfolios.
References
Ardia, D., Bolliger, G., Boudt, K. & Gagnon-Fleure, J.P. (2017). The impact of covariance misspecification in risk-based portfolios. Annals of Operations Research 254, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2474-7
Bernartzi, S. & Thaler, R.H. (2001). Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. American Economic Review 91(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.79
Braga, M.D. (2015). Risk-based approaches to asset allocation: concepts and practical applications. Springer.
Bruder, B. & Roncalli, T. (2012). Managing risk exposures using the risk budgeting approach. Risk Management e Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2009778
Demey, P., Maillard, S., & Roncalli, T. (2010). Risk-based indexation. Available at SSRN 1582998. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1582998
DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus Naive Diversification: How inefficient Is the 1/n Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies 22(5), 1915-1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
Green, R.C. & Hollifield, B. (1992). When will mean-variance efficient portfolios be well diversified? The Journal of Finance 47(5), 1785-1809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04683.x
Hult, H., Lindskog, F., Hammarlid, O., & Rehn, C. J. (2012). Risk and Portfolio Analysis Principles and Methods, Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4103-8
Illmanen, A., & Villalon, D. (2012). Alpha Beyond Expected Returns. Portfolio Constructions 1-12. https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/White-Papers/Alpha-Beyond-Expected-Returns
Jagannathan, R., & Ma, T. (2003). Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps. Journal of Finance 58(4), 1651-1684. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3648224
Kolm, P.N., Tütüncü, R. & Fabozzi, F.J. (2014). 60 Years of Portfolio Optimization: Practical Challenges and Current Trends. European Journal of Operational Research 234, 356-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.060
López de Prado, M. (2018). Advances in financial machine learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Maillard, S., Roncalli, T., & Teiletche, J. (2010). On the Properties of Equally - Weighted Risk Contributions Portfolios. The Journal of Portfolio Management 36(4), 60-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2010.36.4.060
Maimon, O., & Rokach, L. (2010). Introduction to knowledge discovery and data mining. In Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook 1-15. Boston, MA: Springer US.
Manning C.D., Raghavan, P., & Schutze, H. (2008). Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press. http://informationretrieval.org/
Markowitz, H.M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance 7(1), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
Merton, R. C. (1980). On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Financial Economics 8, 323-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(80)90007-0
Munk, C. (2018). Financial Markets and Investment.
https://www.academia.edu/37331452/Financial_Markets_and_Investments
Murtagh, F., & Contreras, P. (2017). Algorithms for hierarchical clustering: an overview, II. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1219
Qian, E.Y. (2005). Risk Parity Portfolios: Efficient Portfolios Through True Diversification. PanAgora Asset Management.https://www.panagora.com/assets/PanAgora-Risk-Parity-Portfolios-Efficient-Portfolios-Through-True-Diversification.pdf
Roncalli, T. (2013). Introduction to Risk Parity and Budgeting. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272973
Rubinstein, M. (2002). Markowitz Portfolio Selection: A Fifty-Year Retrospective. The Journal of Finance 57(3), 1041-1045. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00453
Scherer, B. (2007). Portfolio construction and risk budgeting. Edhec Business School 5.
Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. The Journal of Finance 19(23), 425-442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x
Steinbach, M. C. (2001). Markowitz Revisited: Mean-Variance Models in Financial Portfolio Analysis. SIAM Review 43(1), 31-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S0036144500376650
Windcliff, H. & Boyle, P. (2004). The 1/n Pension Investment Puzzle. North American Actuarial Journal 8(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2004.10596151
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Debjani Palit, Victor R. Prybutok
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
